"I do not want you to be spied on, I do not want you to be hounded, I do not want you to be chucked into a makeshift police station: this is a free country, we must always guarantee freedom and we need a government with a backbone and a Prime Minister who is not weak and who will look after our national interests and ensure that he supports British values, of which freedom is the primary one."
1. To whom, precisely, did she address those words and why would she offer her quiescence to surveillance
against me, my persecution and my unnecessary detention but guarantee their freedom? And how can she guarantee freedom
while ignoring the corrosion of the pillars of freedom, which I have reported and proved to her?
2. If she does not understand that what is being done in my case outrages British values and honour then I
should like to know what she understands them to be.
3. Is it really a free country if:
(i). children in Rotherham are treated as they were (perhaps still are) and the police looks the other way?
(ii). What happened in Hillsborough can happen?
(iii). The Blood scandal can happen?
(iv). The postmasters scandal can happen?
(v). I am detained unlawfully for more than a decade, with all the misconduct I have described, and the
government and others can look the other way?
3. If we think this is freedom, we should revise our understanding of freedom. What is more, the conduct I have
described must lead to ever less freedom.