1. On Monday, 01 November, 2021, I reported numbness in my arms. Only on 16 March, 2022 was I seen by a neurologist. I later learned an appointment was made in November but the hospital detaining me told the examining hospital the matter was not urgent.
(i). On 25 January, however, I wrote to the Chief Executive of the NHS Trust that would examine me, describing my case (including the fact I have been detained since 2015 on the basis of false diagnoses) and reminding her it must be an emergency. It is difficult to understand why the examining hospital considered my case not to be urgent.
2. The Neurologist diagnosed Functional Symptoms and did nothing more (she attempted no remedy). They are also known as "Medically Unexplained Symptoms or Somatic Symptom Disorder". They are often caused by stress or distress.
3. The Neurologist also ordered MRI scans of my brain. I was later told nothing was found.
4. I asked the Neurologist why she did not attempt the obvious remedy: if these were Functional Symptoms, the underlying stress was probably caused by my unlawful detention, - the underlying diagnoses are false and, plainly, I am not dangerous. I suggested we discuss possible solutions. She ignored my offer and took no further action.
5. I wrote to the Board of the examining Hospital, informing it its practitioner had diagnosed a condition for which the cause was apparent, but she refused to attempt a cure. I suggested we discuss possible solutions. The Trust refused to act.
6. The Neurologist's refusal to attempt a cure and the indifference of the Trust are incomprehensible: I suggested they have the detaining Trust produce a valid diagnosis. This would have set my mind at rest, regarding the question of unlawful detention.
(i). The examining Hospital and the Neurologist had a duty to attempt a cure and, once I alleged unlawful detention, especially where it could easily be assessed - by requesting a valid diagnosis be produced - they had a safeguarding duty to determine whether my concerns were legitimate.