Why the Diagnoses Are false

1. The definition of a delusion demands it first be explained clearly and obviously to a person why the conclusions he has reached are wrong. The psychiatrists to whom I have put this point all accept it - I have put it to every psychiatrist who has examined me, since 2017.
2. I have been diagnosed with a delusional disorder more than a dozen times, only one of those diagnoses has explained why the conclusions I reached are wrong:
(i). The other diagnoses can therefore immediately be declared to be invalid.
(ii). That diagnosis is itself not valid:
(a). The reasons should have been put to me before the diagnosis was made, and I should have been given the opportunity either to accept the reasons and alter my views or to explain why I could not accept the reasons. This was not done.
3. The first reason given is that, in 2014, I reported to the police that my computer had been hacked into. But that was a reasonable conclusion to reach.
4. The second reason is that my browser unaccountably returned search results in Spanish. I thought this might be a sign of hacking, which it can be. But it was not that evidence alone which led me to that conclusion. A diagnosis based on these two assertions, where I have not been allowed to respond to the arguments is not valid.
5. That Diagnosis was replete with lies and misrepresentations.
6. The psychiatrists who made the diagnoses on which my detention is based have been unable to explain why the conclusions I reached are wrong, or even to offer plausible alternative interpretations of the facts that brought me to those conclusions. And yet they have refused to withdraw those diagnoses.
7. Given they accept they must first explain why I am wrong, these are not erroneous diagnoses: they are false diagnoses.