1. I do not question the usefulness of Artificial Intelligence: I have used it for some tasks, in developing this website - mainly coding. I also used it to create the image on this page; it can be helpful.
2. I have observed how, lately, the trustworthiness of Artificial Intelligence has appeared to concern many important people. I must warn you against the grave danger of manipulation by AI.
3. Artificial Intelligence could be used deliberately to manipulate people (it is merely a question of adjusting the parameters or settings).
4. I ask you not to trust arguments AI makes both against and for me and the statements made here.
(i). I wrote, to Messrs: Altman (OpenAI), Amodei (Anthropic), Brin and Page (Google and Alphabet), asking them to have their AI evaluate and fact-check my views - I sent them documents making the assertions made here, and a lot more besides, and evidence supporting those assertions.
(a). I undertook to have the results, whatever they were, checked by universities including Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, etc.
(b). I had previously written to those universities (more than one hundred universities), asking them to check these facts and the reasoning behind the assertions I have advanced. I sent them documents setting out my views, and some of the evidence on which those views are based.
(ii). I explained to the Universities and to the Heads of those AI firms that I intended publically to make these statement and that I would not make them, were they shown to be unsound. I informed them I would not wish to publish such statements, were they not correct. They refused to engage.
(iii). I made the same offer to Messrs: Musk (X, Grock, etc.), Nadella (Microsoft), and Bezos (Amazon, the Washington Post, and certain AI ventures).
5. Had they accepted my offer, we would, today, say that those Universities and AI firms consider my assertions to be reasonable and or true. Or I would not have published this website (had they shown my views to be mistaken).
(i). And so, I do not ask that you not allow Artificial Intelligence AI to persuade you I am wrong (no matter how compelling a case it might try to make), without giving me the opportunity to respond. I even go as far as to ask you to try not to reach that conclusion before we put all the facts before everyone and discuss them openly, which we shall do should the Prime Minister fail to produce a valid diagnosis of me.
6. Please consider the names in the ticker at the foot of each page: those are only some of the people and organisations to whom I have written. Should the Prime Minister fail to produce a valid diagnosis, we should interview most of them and ask them to explain their responses (or lack thereof) to these matters.
(i). None of those people or organisations has been able to rebut the assertions made here. Almost all of them have refused to deny the validity of these assertions, when I have asked them openly to do so.
7. If the Prime Minister is unable to produce a valid diagnosis that has been the basis for my diagnosis, you would have proof of how untrustworthy the state is, even in the EU and in North America: for they too have been involved in this.
(i). Consider how they have persuaded so many people and organisations in all these countries do their bidding,
(ii). You might start to realise that the Artificial Intelligence in which you place such confidence could be your very own state-assigned, personal propagandist.
8. Naturally, you will wonder whether I have put my views to Artificial Intelligence: I have. It almost invariably agrees with me. On rare occasions, it has opposed me with astonishing ferocity and staggering irrationality.