The Labour Party in Opposition

1. I started writing to members the Labour Party in 2017. I have written to three MPs who were my MPs, and to another Labour MP who previously and famously campaigned on a similar matter and exposed the abuse in Rotherham Their responses are treated here. Essentially, they did not deny the reports I made were valid, but they refused to act and could not plausibly explain why.
2. I wrote to each shadow secretary for Justice, Health and Home Affairs: none denied the validity of the reports I made, all refused to act. Some cited an irrelevant custom of the House of Commons, others ignored me entirely. Their responses are treated in the relevant ministry and department sections of the UK Government section
3. When the General Election was announced, in 2024, I reported these matters to the Chairs of one-hundred-and-forty-two Labour Party offices around the country. I explained that not to inform the public of such matters during the Campaign would probably render the Elections undemocratic. They did not deny the validity of the reports but, to my knowledge, they did not act on those reports.

Mr Jeremy Corbyn

4. While Mr Corbyn led the Labour Party, I reported these matters to him. His response was that parliamentary rules prevent him from acting.
(i). The parliamentary rule does not forbid the MPs in question to act. Certainly, it does not apply to the leader of the opposition, in such matters.

Sir Keir Starmer

5. Sir Keir Starmer claimed to be forbidden to act by that Convention. His response to these matters, after he became Prime Minister, is described here.
6. The statement by Sir Keir (audio, above) was made on 08 July, 2022. I have not found it - and indeed any of his public utterances - very useful when I try to understand:
(i). Why he did not challenge the Government on the matters I reported to him and
(ii). why he did not, at that time and since, lead by example rather than by precept. His response to my case plainly shows he did not.
6. I was forced to file a lawsuit against the Labour Party. The Party and Sir Keir ignored the suit that was served on them. I warned him and senior members of his Shadow Cabinet they were ignoring an Action that had been served on them. They ignored the warning. In other words: Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party, under his leadership, refused to respect the rule of law.
(i). To ignore a lawsuit that has been served on you is to disrespect the court and, by extension, the law and the rules by which society is supposed to live - it is to refuse to live under the law. Sir Keir is a lawyer and has been the Director of Public Prosecutions.