1. Since 2017, I have reported the matters treated on this website to news organisations here, on the Continent and in the United States. The ticker and list, below, name the news organisations, and this map shows their locations.
2. In each case, I:
(i). provided evidence, including official documents, to support the statements I made,
(ii). encouraged them to indicate factual and logical flaws in the reports, and
(iii). suggested they have the reports and documents fact-checked and offered to discuss how this might be arranged.
3. They did not reject the validity of the statements I made but they refused to report them.
4. During the weekend of 10 October, 2020, the Hospital detaining me appears to have made an attempt on my life:
(i). I had developed high blood pressure. On that day, I experienced numbness in my arms.
(ii). My blood pressure was read at 192/120, which is a hypertensive crisis, but the hospital insisted I was fine and did nothing.
(iii). Realising my life was in danger, I telephoned several medical organisations and then, no options remaining, I telephoned several news organisations.
(a). I described the situation and explained emergency numbers were blocked on the telephone I was using.
(b). I asked them to send for an ambulance. I told them they could first confirm with the Hospital that I was indeed there and that the facts I had given were correct (including blood pressure readings).
(c). They refused to do so. Subsequently, they were unable to explain why they had refused to send for an ambulance. One newspaper that records telephone calls, did not produce the recording of the telephone call I placed with it: it claimed, implausibly, that it was unable to retrieve the recording.
(d). One of those news organisations subsequently reported its own outrage at the death of a patient in a hospital, after he was denied medical care. I simply entered the question, on its Facebook page, under the article: "How do you decide what is newsworthy?". I wished to understand why they considered that matter newsworthy but did not report my case and even refused to send for an ambulance when my life was in danger and I was being denied medical attention.
(e). Facebook immediately disabled my account (within minutes). I wrote to Mr Zuckerberg and Ms Sandberg, asking them to reinstate my account and explaining I intended to use it to fight my false detention, of which I sent them incontrovertible proof in the form of official documents clearly showing psychiatrists failing to defend the diagnoses and my detention. At the very least, Facebook cannot have been in doubt as to my identity, nevertheless, they refused to reinstate my account.
5. Before the General Election of 2024, I contacted the news organisations again. I asked whether they thought my reports lacked validity and if they thought it was responsible not to inform the public of these facts before it voted: not to do so would mean people making uninformed decisions, which would in fact make the elections undemocratic.
(i). They did not deny my reports were valid but they did not divulge them to the public.
6. Since November, 2025, I have again approached news organisations, informing them I would inform the public of these matters and asking if they consider my statements to lack validity. None of them has said they do.

View as List