Dame Priti Patel

1. I informed Dame Patel of South Yorkshire Police's refusal to investigate serious offences I reported to it, and its failure to defend those decisions.
2. I described to her the Campaign against me and offered her proof of a pattern of misconduct and questionable behaviour, which set the conduct of the police in context as part of a broader pattern of questionable decisions by authorities and proved the Campaign I described was probably real.
3. On 13 November, 2019. I telephoned her office and spoke to her assistant. She said she required more time to make enquiries and would return a response.
4. On 27 November, having received no response, I telephoned the Office. I spoke to the same woman. When I identified myself, she immediately put the phone down.
(i). I continued to call the Office: I received a busy signal. When it rang, eventually, it was picked up and instantly replaced, to terminate the call. I reported this to Dame Patel.
5. On 06 December, I telephoned the Office. The same woman answered; she put the phone down the instant I identified myself.
(i). I continued to call. Eventually, a man answered. He refused to give his name and said the woman was not in. He would not say whether Dame Patel had received my letters. He directed me to General Enquiries. I explained it was not a matter for General Enquiries. He insisted it was and promptly forwarded my call to General Enquiries. I only realised he had done so when I heard an automated recording telling me I was through to General Enquiries.
6. I sent a letter to Dame Patel, informing her of the conduct of her staff. I received no response. I later received a letter from the Home Office, stating it could not interfere with police. I pointed out I simply wanted her to have South Yorkshire Police explain why it had refused to investigate the matters I reported.
7. On 14 January, 2020, I spoke to another advisor, on the telephone, she asked me to send documents. I did. I received no response.
8. On 12 March, 2020, I spoke to yet another advisor. She said she would look into the matter; I sent her documents. I received no response.
9. On 05 August, 2020, after the Wiley affair in which she demanded an explanation from Twitter, regarding its conduct over his tweets, I wrote to her asking how she determined what matters required her involvement, and why she held Twitter to account but not the police, the judiciary, the NHS and all the other people and organisations I had shown were engaged in misconduct. She returned no response.