1. There appears to be an attempt to have me leave the Hospital, to enable my arrest on some pretext. I am unsure of the precise mechanics of the plan: it must involve using a person or people somehow to manufacture a pretext for my arrest, while I am out.
2. It seems the plan was to stop payments, as they did, preventing publication of the website. I would later be induced to leave the Hospital and, while I was out, they would create a pretext for my arrest. I would then be railroaded into prison, without having been discharged. I would be imprisoned for several years more, unable to inform the world of these crimes. In prison, I could not continue the work I have been doing in hospital.
3. In January, 2025, my leave was withdrawn because I intended to visit the offices of the Mayor of South Yorkshire and to ask him to explain why he refused to hold the Chief Constable to account.Throughout that year, the hospital unjustifiably refused to reinstate leave.
4. In February, 2026, the Hospital suddenly became keen to have me take leave. Finding this suspicious, I refused to take leave.
(i). After a few months of trying to persuade me to take leave, the psychiatrist in charge of my case asked me what would persuade me to take leave. I explained only an emergency. He asked:
"If your computer stopped working would you take leave to have it repaired or if you had to go to the Post Office to send forms to renew your driving licence, would you take leave"
(i). I said I would (in previous years, I requested leave to have my computer repaired). A fortnight later, my computer mysteriously stopped working. There are grounds to believe they sabotaged the computer to force me out.
(a). I told the Hospital I believed there was an attempt to force me to leave the Hospital, in order to have me arrested on a pretext and I refused to leave the hospital.
(b). I arranged for a member of staff to take the computer to a computer repair shop I had previously used. At first they claimed there had been nothing wrong with the computer, later they declared a problem with a small part of the memory. I shall treat that matter in more detail when the website-proper is published. They charged me a small amount for the repairs and agreed to have me pay it when payments were recommenced - I previously bought new computers from them and had them repair computers on a few occasions.
5. The Hospital and DWP then started trying to force me to visit DWP's offices. They said payments would otherwise not be restarted. This was unreasonable: previous applications were made without my having to laeve the hospital. I refused to leave the hospital. This went on for several months.
6. The hospital then gave me a small amount of cash which it said was for me to buy necessities, since I had not received money in more than six months. My bank accounts having been closed, I asked that the money be wired to GoDaddy and Proton AG, with whom I have accounts. I was going to use the money to buy a domain name and other services I would need to publish this website.
7. They were caught unawares, they refused to have the money transferred but could not explain why. This is yet more evidence of a cover-up, which I shall produce when I publish the website-proper, which I should do, if the Prime Minister is unable to produce a valid diagnosis - and he will not produce such a diagnosis: it does not exist.
8. The Hospital and DWP have continued to try to force me to leave the Hospital. For example: DWP eventuallyagreed to have my identity confirmed without my visiting its offices - which is what they have automatically done,previously, since I am sectioned. It said it would post forms to me to confirm my identity and I should return them by physical mail.
(i). The forms I returned to DWP by Royal Mail were not delivered: Royal Mail claimed to have mislaid them, occasioning a delay of three weeks durin which they told me to continue to wait for the mail (sent by First Class Signed for Service) to be delivered.
(ii). I had another copy of the forms delivered by hand to the local DWP office. Enclosed with the documents was a covering letter written under the TogetherWithOurFriends letterhead. DWP immediately declared the letterhead showed I am a director of firm, I should therefore make such a declaration or payments might not be made. They also insisted I visit their offices (again, trying to force me to leave the hospital).
(iii). I asked how I might make such a declaration (where, to whom and how) and I explained, given the circumstances and the reasons I could not visit their offices (I am sectioned and believe attempts are being made to force me to leave the Hospital so I might be arrested on a pretext), they should not keep trying to force me to go out into public.
(iv). Messages on the DWP's Online Journal should receive a response within two days. The DWP did not respond for more than three weeks. During that time, I sent a further message. Neither was there any progress in confirming my identity and reinstating the payments,