Mr David Lidington

1. While Mr Lidington was Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, he was responsible for my detention: the decision to ease restrictions and even to return my liberty were his to make and he could have made them at any time.
2. I reported to and did furnish Mr Lidington with clear proof my detention was unlawful:
(i). I showed it is based on false diagnoses and
(ii). practitioners are unable to defend their assertions that, were I to be discharged, I would pose a danger to others.
3. I reported, to Mr Lidington, the unlawful decision, by the Tribunal of 2017, that I lacked the mental capacity to select a representative.
4. I reported to him the unnecessary prosecution brought against me by the Crown Prosecution Service, when my case plainly failed the mandatory Public Interest Test which the Code for Public Prosecutors requires each case meet.
(i). While the MoJ is not responsible for the CPS, this was important information the Secretary of State could not ignore, especially given all the other misconduct by different parties in cases involving me, including organisations within his purview: it etched more clearly a substantial pattern of questionable decisions.
(ii). It was part of a clear pattern indicating a concerted effort, involving these organisations, to railroad a person into detention. Ultimately, that person (I) was sectioned unjustly. More than ten years later, I continue unjustly to be detained.
5. Mr Lidington did not act on any of the matters I reported to him.