Sir Robert Buckland

1. When Sir Robert Buckland became Secretary of State for Justice, he became responsible for my detention. I wrote to him reporting:
(i). my unlawful detention,
(ii). the dozens of unlawful decisionsagainst me by the judiciary: I explained that, while the MoJ had previously stated it cannot become involved in individual cases, it could not ignore such misconduct by the judiciary, and the Constitution Reform Act 2005 addressed that point,
(iii). my detention in unnecessarily restrictive conditions, due to incontestably false assertions by psychiatrists that I could not safely be in a less restrictive hospital. I provided him with:
(a). letters exchanged with the psychiatrist who declared me too dangerous to be in less restrictive conditions - in those letters, he fails to attempt a cogent defence of that view and even of the diagnosis of a mental disorder -, and
(b). a model showing I am not dangerous,
(iv). that section 41 of the Mental Health Act had been imposed on the strength of perjured evidence.
2. When I wrote to Sir Robert, I predicted unlawful decisions would be made in legal actions I had filed with the courts. When that did happen, I informed him the predictions had been borne out. I observed, in England, today, a person can correctly predict the courts will make unlawful decisions in several cases. I asked him whether he found that fact disconcerting.
3. I also reported, to Sir Robert, the unreasonable refusal by the Crown Court to produce transcripts of my case.
4. Apart from stating that the MoJ could not be involved in individual cases, Sir Robert ignored the matters I reported to him.
(i). He failed to produce a valid diagnosis,
(ii). he would not describe the model by which the MoJ determined I was dangerous, to explain why it was preferable to my Model, to show my model was not adequate or that I had misapplied it or misinterpreted its results when I said it showed, plainly, I am not dangerous.
5. As Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, Sir Robert refused to uphold the law and the constitution - when it strays, the judiciary should be held to account. He continued and left unresolved my detention in defiance of national and international law, basic decency and values - even freedom of thought.
(i). he suffered that such unlawful detention should be endured in unnecessarily restrictive conditions.
(ii). He was careless of the principles of Accountability and Transparency.
6. Sir Robert was later granted a fellowship by the John F Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. I reported his conduct as Secretary of State to the Dean of the Kennedy School and three Presidents of Harvard. I sought their opinion on the matters I had reported to Sir Robert and asked if they considered an association with a person who has conducted himself as he did to reflect the values and standards of those two institutions. I received no response.